Alabama Legislators Ought To Follow The Maxim, First Do No Harm...Which Bill Is Better SB13 vs SB9 For Those Fighting The Biden Mandates
Please share and be the media for such a time as this.
Food for Thought From Health Freedom Alabama --(HB31 the house bill for Health Freedom has a new bill number but SB13 is the one we need to support in the Senate):
Senator Orr’s bill to address vaccine mandates, SB13, will address all issues related to discrimination based upon your vaccine status. Furthermore, it has a provision in the bill for the Attorney General to protect and defend businesses from over reaching vaccine mandates by the federal government. There is no way to anticipate all of the ways that bad players will try and “work around” this vaccine mandate problem. However, if protection is provided in the form of an anti-discrimination bill then all matters and potential ill-conceived plots can be covered under a bill that addresses discrimination based upon someone’s vaccination or immunity status.
Elliott’s bill, SB9, has no penalties for people who violate the law and puts the responsibility for developing policies on this matter in the lap of the Department of Labor. It will create MORE bureaucracy to regulate your fundamental rights to just say no to a vaccine. Additionally, his bill gives the Dept. of Labor SIXTY DAYS to develop their policy. We CANNOT wait sixty days to give people relief from these mandates. They are losing their jobs NOW! SB9 will not address any other discrimination issues we see in the workplace due to your vaccine status such as weekly testing paid for by the employee, separate eating areas for vaxxed vs unvaxxed and higher insurance responsibilities for the unvaxxed employee. Elliott’s bill is also short sighted because it only addresses Covid 19 vaccines. What happens when Fauci declares the “Dexter” virus to be the next pandemic? We will be back in this same boat. Another problem is that SB9 defines employee as “an individual who is employed by an employer.” What about volunteers or contracted workers? They will be left out and not covered under Elliott’s short sighted bill.
Please get your legislator to support SB13 filed by Senator Orr. It is a much better bill, it will withstand the test of time and will give relief to the citizens of Alabama immediately upon passage.
Please share the above points and pray, pray, pray. We actually have a bill that can separate us from the Biden evil while the other one sadly--carries it through. There are more states invalidating these mandates...Tn just did it today. We pray our Alabama Legislature will stand with We the people. SB13 gives help for businesses too and the bottom line as the US Sen Ron Johnson said--"These mandates are pointless!" Watch video here:
lots more info here:
of what he learned from experts in hearings that unfortunately news is not covering. The right thing to do for the people is to not let Biden get away with his evil mandates but instead stand tall and strong against it. SB13 will give us that opportunity.
WHEN: Tuesday, Nov. 2 10 a.m. – 12 p.m. ET WHERE: Russell Senate Office Building, Kennedy Caucus Room 325
Will Ivey, Speaker McCutcheon, Legislature Wine and Dine Thanksgiving and Christmas While Families Mourn The Loss of Jobs, Freedoms?? May The Holy Spirit Lead Them.
Will Governor Kay Ivey, Legislators and Speaker McCutcheon be found innocent when Alabamians find themselves destroyed during Thanksgiving and Christmas? In the God-fearing state of Alabama, we hope our leaders will remember the story of the Good Samaritan and not just the people by. Ivey's Executive Order is NOT ENOUGH. The Biden Administration has put pressure on Chambers of Commerce and BCA (Business Council of Alabama is party to that. We must think things through as destroying the people through their jobs, ultimately destroys many others as we are not an island. The businesses the BCA wants to protect will also be destroyed as our state economy will be destroyed as people will leave these jobs to get other jobs, many in other states. Read more on Ivey's Executive Order from HealthFreedomAlabama.com and please get your legislator to understand what US Senator Ron Johnson is telling the country about the results of the covid 19 hearings. We should not be following the Biden Mandates!
Gov. Kay Ivey, Speaker McCutcheon and our Legislature ought to stand strong and proclaim the truths that U.S. Senator Ron Johnson along 21 GOP members sent in a letter to President Biden. US Sen. Johnson makes it clear that the vaccine mandates pointless those that are vaccinated can get sick and transmit:
Johnson called the federal COVID vaccination mandates divisive and corrosive.
“The reason I’m speaking out on this, the reason I’m willing to be attacked, draw the fire on this, is hopefully to draw attention to the insanity of going down this path enforcing these mandates,” Johnson said. “There has been way too much loss of freedom, way too much self-inflicted harm to our society, to people. What’s the purpose of the vaccine mandates if you can still get infected, if you can still transmit? Why are we dividing our society with these incredibly corrosive and freedom-robbing mandates? It makes no sense, and that’s my problem with the way we’ve treated COVID. So much of the way we’ve handled COVID makes no sense whatsoever.”
So let's not beat around the bush, this is about controlling the entire nation to its knees and bringing forth the Biden/Sanders/AOC dream of Socialism. Alabamians who says We Dare Defend Our Rights are appealing to the governor, McCutcheon and legislature to do the right thing in this special session as yes --our jobs are more important otherwise we can not vote for you. We ask that you unselfishly set aside your priority as politicians and instead pray to God for the Holy Spirit to lead you. God sees what is in executive order and God knows the legislature actually has ability to be the force the force that is needed behind.
In this upside down world were people are being treated less undeserving of their hard-earned jobs, undeserving of their way of life. Many businessmen have already seen the tyranny and do not want that passed on. If people do not comply they lose everything some may even lose their lives as they no longer are in control of their health and as US Sen Johnson said in this interview--vaccine mandates are pointless.
For what does it profit a man to gain the whole world and forfeit his soul?"
The BCA who think they are protecting businesses need to remember there is one greater who warned us what would it profit a man if he gains the whole world this is so loses his soul--BCA is made up of people.. We hope and pray we'll listen to God's word and not steal from these hard-working families. Their jobs are crucial for their families stability and future. in Alabama's preamble we asked for the blessings almighty God. May It Be this Thanksgiving and Christmas we will be thankful for Governor Ivey, Speaker McCutcheon (who we are hearing is wanting to hold up the bill) and our legislators for protecting Alabama's families versus being followers of Joe Biden. He doesn't mind using his own son...we hope Alabama legislature will not sacrifice Alabama families for Biden and Co. plan for America.
Compare 379 Deaths in 25 yrs vs 16,766 Deaths Plus 798,000 Adverse Events/Injuries In Just 10 Months! Hear Sen. Ron Johnson!
Hear Ron Johnson Confirm!
What Happens When Rich Wants To Get Richer And They Run The Government? Could People Die? Could America Become Run By Socialists? Time For Americans To Choose Their Future
Instead of shouting it from the rooftop-the therapeutic that was found so effective that Mexico gave it so their country avoided our lock-downs, India used it after Utter Pradesh (population 70% of US) found it cut their death rate tremendously...but in America the news hides it and/or vilifies it.
Here's some must watch videos. Here's link on Senator Ron Johnson along with 21 other GOP members standing up to Biden. It is time to end Big Pharma and their allies gold mine...it starts with sharing these videos so more can decide for themselves. A propaganda media is no media at all and to help ourselves we must be the media and share the truths. Pray hard for God's help....all our families future is on the line.
The Cheap Cure vs The Lust For Money
Biden's Boss is China--so Who Is Running America? All Freedom loving citizens need to watch above videos---Truth is Powerful. Please share and watch what happens. Be in the David and Goliath fight. Have Faith--David did and it made the difference.
"A vaccine enforcement mechanism has been included as part of the $3.5 trillion 'Build Back Better Bill' which allows for a tenfold increase in fines for employers
They hope you won't fight against the latest Budget Package--until you read about the fines here:
More on Bernie Sanders--co authoring America's move to Socialism with Biden & Co:
Biden has lot of allies and bosses...it is going to take a lot of people praying and getting involved in politics. May God help us fight for his precious gift of our Republic that sadly we have allowed to go to hands of evil leaders and harms so many including innocent children. Don't forget God's promises and...pray daily and be strengthened.
Call to Action:
|File Size:||190 kb|
More Food for Thought:
Many governments have made nose and mouth
covering or face
masks compulsory for schoolchildren. The
evidence base for
this is weak. A large scale survey in Germany of
adverse effects in parents and
children using data of 25,930
children has shown that 68% of the participating
problems when wearing nose and mouth
This leads in turn to impairments attributable to
hypercapnia. A recent review concluded that
there was ample evidence for adverse effects of
wearing such masks. We suggest
that decision-makers weigh the hard evidence
these experimental measurements accordingly,
which suggest that children should not be forced
to wear face masks.
Harald Walach, PhD
Ronald Weikl, MD
Juliane Prentice, BA
Andreas Diemer, PhD, MD
Helmut Traindl, PhD
Anna Kappes, MA
Stefan Hockertz, PhD
Joseph L. Bourgault
commented on 04 January, 2021
I am President of a Manufacturing Company in
Saskatchewan, Canada. Under Saskatchewan
Occupational Health & Safety Rules it is illegal for
me to expose any of my Employees to a
Hazardous Environment, above 1,500 ppm CO2
levels (Atmospheric is 375 to 400 ppm), or below
19.5% Oxygen levels (Atmospheric Oxygen is
20.9%). OSHA Safety Officers have measured
at 17.4% behind an N95 mask with an IBRID 6
Gas Monitor. Del Bigtree, Medical Research
Journalist measured CO2 levels between 8,000
to 10,000 ppm behind a cloth mask and over
10,000 ppm behind an N95 mask which is
Hazardous Environment! OSHA Experts have
openly reported that face masks are hazardous to
the health of those wearing them, but are
rountinely ignored by Governments around the
world who passed these OSHA Laws based on
50 plus years of scientific research. Since when
are Governments exempt from following the laws
they legislate? Dr. Russell Blaylock, a
neurosurgeon explains that low oxygen levels
cause hypoxia, and can damage the immune
system lowering T-lymphocytes that fight viral
infections. Cloth masks filter at best to 5 micron,
the covid-19 virus is reported to be .06 to .12
micron. In other words the openings in a cloth
mask are 50 to 100 times larger than the covid-19
virus. Imagine a
screen door with opening 50 to 100 times larger
than a mosquito, how would that keep the
mosquitoes out the house! Truth does not matter
in this 2020-2021 World run by; W.H.O. & Bill
Gates, the U.N. Agenda 2030, and their plans to
reduce the world's population, e.g. Georgia
Guidestones erected in 1981 by wealthy people.
Political Leaders around the world have either
been paid off or black mailed or lack the
intelligence, wisdom and courage to do what is
right and to Stand Up for Scientific Truths that the
President of Manufacturing Company understand
is 100% Wrong in what we are doing to our
children! I pray God will have mercy on the souls
of all the cowards around the World who know
better but do nothing to stop this insanity! As
honest Abraham Lincoln would say: "Stand with
any man when he stands right and apart from him
when he is wrong." I know where I am standing!
The question is where are those who know what
is happening standing?
Thank you for publishing this Study! I am very
grateful to those who have organized this
Scientific Study to shed further light on these
"crimes against our children" and "crimes against
ignorant unsuspecting adults" who are supposed
to be protecting the children around world and
who are blindly trust corrupted Governments.
May God bless you and keep you! Sincerely,
Joseph L. Bourgault, Truth Seeker &
Saskatchewan Order of Merit Recipient, 2011
commented on 04 January, 2021
I am a Senior Industrial Hygienist of 18 years. We
are the SMEs in Respiratory Protection. I have
managed the Respiratory Protection
Program for over 76K employees. There is not
one single study showing that the wide variety of
face masks are safe for use, especially prolonged
use. I will simply put that if I ever put the public or
employees in face masks that are not ready to
protect against the hazard at hand, I would lose
my job and be fined. The United States is
violating it's very own OSHA laws and the
institution has been weaponized by politicians.
These masks are about policy, not science. None
of these face masks are rated to protect against
this virus in either direction. We are dealing with
censorship and no one is getting the truth about
these masks. The WHO stated, in March, that
these masks can cause infections if they're not
utilized properly. Throughout my career, I have
seen bacterial infections from people who were
not washing or changing out their respirators or
masks, as required. The CDC recently said that
masks cannot cause
bacterial infections. As a subject matter expert, I
know this is completely false. I did a video about
it and YouTube took it down and gave me a strike
on my channel. I am unsure why some 22-year-
old can fact check me and tell me I'm not allowed
to say anything that goes against the CDC, but
the CDC is going against the WHO. WHAT
MAKES US EVEN WORSE, IS THAT THESE
MASKS ARE IN FACT PPE. I WOULD LIKE TO
KNOW HOW IN 29 CFR 1910.132 it says if
anyone were to bring a homemade or DIY form of
PPE into the workplace, it is up to the employee
to ensure that that PPE is rated to protect them
against the hazard it is being worn for. The
amount of contradictions are astounding. PPE is
supposed to be a last resort, but we've made it
the first line of defense. These face masks are
not only hazardous to human health, but they
actually make people violate social distancing
and stand closer together. This false sense of
illusion is causing more issues
like self-contamination and cross-contamination.
commented on 06 January, 2021
I am glad to see this study. The use of masks has
bothered me for two reasons: 1) Potential
Cognitive Harm: Randomized, Controlled studies
on slightly elevated CO2 levels of 1000 to 2500
ppm show significant decreases in cognitive
functioning. The long-term implications for this
are unclear. 2) Little to no Benefit: Non-medical
masks have been
shown to block droplets, but actually increase fine
aerosol emissions. Even medical grade surgical
masks are equivocal in randomized, controlled
studies. The masks seem more designed to show
something is being done than to actually reduce
virus transmission. It seems that the health of
school children is possibly being harmed to give
the appearance of doing something. References:
CO2: 1) News Article on This Study: Savchuk, K.
"Your Brain on Carbon Dioxide: Research Finds
Even Low Levels of Indoor CO2 Impair Thinking."
California Magazine (2016).
Satish, U., Mendell, M., et al. Is CO2 an Indoor
Pollutant? Direct Effects of Low-to-Moderate CO2
Concentrations on Human Decision-Making
Performance Environmental Health Perspectives,
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104789. 3) Allen,
MacNaughton, P.et al. Associations of Cognitive
Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation,
and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in
Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of
Green and Conventional Office Environments.
Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol 124, No
6, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510037
Lack of Effectiveness: 4)
I urge you to obtain an exemption so you can be
allowed to work without your face coverings, ET.
German neurologist Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson
states, “The reinhalation of our exhaled air will
without a doubt create oxygen deficiency and a
flooding of carbon dioxide. We know that the
human brain is very sensitive to oxygen
deprivation. There are nerve cells for example in
the hippocampus that can’t be longer than 3
minutes without oxygen – they cannot survive.
"The acute warning symptoms are headaches,
drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration,
slowing down of reaction time – reactions of the
cognitive system. "However, when you have
chronic oxygen deprivation, all of those
symptoms disappear, because you get used to it.
But your efficiency will remain impaired and the
under-supply of oxygen in your brain continues to
progress. "While you’re thinking that you have
gotten used to wearing your mask and
rebreathing your own exhaled air, the
degenerative processes in your brain are getting
amplified as your oxygen deprivation continues.
"The second problem is that the nerve cells in
your brain are unable to divide themselves
normally. So in case our
governments will generously allow as to get rid of
the masks and go back to breathing oxygen
freely again in a few months, the lost nerve cells
will no longer be regenerated. What is gone is
Letter from a Doctor to Help In These Trying Times of Covid-19:(If you would like to have a doctor speak to your club or group...please contact doctor at end of this letter. Thank you)
We have an unprecedented opportunity to help our patients and friends in preventing and effectively treating COVID-19. This is a critical time for us in medicine. You may not be aware that the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons is suing the FDA for making hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) unavailable to physicians and pharmacies.a Why are they suing to make this medication available? I believe that it is because they did the research that I have done and have come to the same conclusion: We need an effective early prehospital treatment or we cannot prevail against this virus. We have that treatment. It is hydroxychloroquin, which if given early in combination with zinc, in appropriate doses, HCQ is safe and highly effective for prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19.
In fact, if hydroxychloroquine were used universally in the US for prophylaxis and treatment, the death rate could possibly be reduced from 1500 deaths a day to as little as 100 per day! This pandemic could come to a screeching halt and life could return to normal, not the new normal. Business and schools could reopen and we could prevent the worst depression in history, a depression that will kill many more than this pandemic.b
The website c19study.com is a compendium of all the studies that have been done to date, with a short explanation of the results. As of December 4, there are 192 studies, 126 of which are peer reviewed, the vast majority showing that hydroxychloroquine is safe and very effective. They estimated that 754,769 lives have been been lost worldwide by not using hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine.
Studies that support the use of HCQ report reduction in hospitalization by up to 80% and a reduction in mortality up to 80%.1,2 See also the studies below and others at c19study.com and breggin.com/coronavirus-resource-center/.
In addition, HCQ when given prophylactically for at least 6 weeks prior to exposure reduces the risk of contracting the virus by up to 80%.3 You can do the math. If HCQ was used universally in the US for prophylaxis, within 6 weeks there would be 80% less cases. And if the 20% that get sick have an 80% reduced chance of dying, then we end up with little or no pandemic.
How did I come to this conclusion since there are so many conflicting studies and information on HCQ? As most of you may not have time to review all these studies, please allow me to outline some of the highlights of the research that I have done that helped me to clear up the confusion.
First, it is important to understand the mechanism of action of hydroxychloroquine.4 It works in at least 6 ways to help defeat this virus. I will mention only two. First, it binds to the spike protein on the virus which prevents it’s attachment to the ACE 2 receptor on human cells. This prevents the viral RNA insertion into the cells in order to replicate. Since it can not attach, our T cells are then able to destroy the virus. This then, as I understand it, destroys the virus and provides T cell immunity to prevent future infection with the same virus. This is why it works well for prophylaxis and creates immunity at the same time.
Second, it is a zinc ionophore which, as you know, facilitates zinc transport into our cells. The zinc inhibits RNA dependent RNA polymerase thus inhibiting viral replication. That is why HCQ is much more effective when given with zinc.
Understanding these mechanisms of action helps to make sense of the numerous studies on HCQ, some showing benefit and others not. These are the clarifying principles:
- HCQ must be given early - less than 4 days of symptoms and no more than 7
- HCQ must be given with zinc5
- HCQ must be given in non-toxic doses
Now let me ask, why did the WHO, FDA and many state medical and pharmaceutical boards impede the use of HCQ? Why in some states (not in Alabama) is a doctor’s license in jeopardy if he or she prescribed HCQ for COVID? Why are many pharmacies refusing to fill prescriptions for HCQ for COVID? Here in Huntsville, I have had pharmacies refuse to fill prescriptions. Hospitals have made it hard and in some cases impossible to order HCQ for a patient, even when a patient requests it. Why did this happen especially when many initial observational and retrospective studies were showing very good results with HCQ? Why are websites being taken down and Facebook and Google removing information positive about HCQ?
The big clamp down occurred when a study was published May 22 on line by both the NEJM and the Lancet.6 The study by Mehra, et al, claimed to be a multinational registry analysis of 96,032 patients from 39 countries. The study claimed mortality in the control 9.3%, HCQ 18.0%, HCQ plus macrolide 23.8%, chloroquine 16.4%, chloroquine plus macrolide 22.2%. Immediately observant doctors and scientists questioned how Surgisphere, a company with only 11 employees, could accumulate data from 39 countries in this short of time. When hospitals in Australia and Africa started reporting that they had never given data to Surgisphere, it became obvious that the data was completely or in large part fabricated. Surgisphere immediately retracted the study on June 4 and they refused to give data to anyone. It was fictitious.7,8
Why did Surgisphere fabricate a study to discredit hydroxychloroquine, shortly after President Trump had announced on May 18 that he was taking it, and why did the NEJM and the Lancet publish it without peer review? On May 24, 2020 Philippe Douste-Blazy, Cardiology MD, Former France Health Minister and 2017 candidate for Director of WHO, former Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations, revealed that in a recent 2020 Chattam House closed door meeting, both the editors of the Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine stated their concerns about the criminal pressures of BigPharma on their publications. Things are so bad that it is not science any longer.9,10
The fall out from this fraudulent Lancet/NEJM study was immediate. The WHO recommended HCQ studies be stopped and thousands were. Good randomized controlled studies were discontinued. They also recommended against the use of HCQ. The FDA then came out against the use of HCQ and removed the emergency use authorization. Even though the study was retracted in both journals within 2 weeks, these restrictions have not been removed. Many physicians continue to be unsure of the safety of HCQ and so are not using it.
One day after the Lancet study by Surgisphere was retracted on June 4, the Recovery trial results were announced on June 5, followed shortly thereafter by the Solidarity trial, and Remap COVID trial. These studies were heralded as exceptionally good data since they were large randomized trials. The problem with the data, overlooked by most, is that these studies all used toxic doses of HCQ, 2 to 2-1/2 times the known safe dose.11 The studies claim to show no benefit. It is a miracle that they did not show harm. Why these toxic doses were chosen was either terrible lack of judgement or malicious intent to discredit HCQ. I believe that it was intentional and even criminal, using improper doses that killed patients.
Let me illustrate. What if a study on ibuprofen was undertaken using 2000mg four times daily instead of the known upper limit safe dose of 800mg four times daily? The study would show that it was either harmful or ineffective. That is exactly what these studies did, intentionally or unintentionally. Given that we know the safe dose of ibuprofen, the only apparent reason for using a toxic dose is to intentionally skew the data. I think we would all agree that such a dose of ibuprofen would be criminal.
Because of these three studies, appropriate studies that were using correct doses of HCQ were stopped such as the NIH ORCHID study12 and the hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir treatment arm of a WHO study13, that could have shown benefit of HCQ in large randomized trials.
It is not possible to go through all of the studies on HCQ. The most effective way is to review the description of the studies on c19study.com. You will note that there are far more studies showing benefit of HCQ than there are negative studies. You will also note that in the negative studies HCQ was given too late, in toxic doses, or only to the sickest of the patients. In some, it was given only at the end of life.
I believe that we can agree that Hydroxychloroquine is safe when used in doses known for decades to be safe for rheumatologic conditions. That dose is 200mg BID, after a loading dose of 400mg BID on day one. Many of you may have been discouraged from using HCQ because of studies that showed that it was either harmful or ineffective. As you review the studies below and those on the websites that I have mentioned, I think you will feel comfortable using the medication. At the end of this letter I have included 3 protocols for the safe use of HCQ, one for pre-exposure prophylaxis, one for post-exposure prophylaxis, and one for treatment of active infection with COVID. I think that you will agree that these treatment protocols are safe and well designed, because they use multiple weapons that have been shown to be effective against the virus. That would explain why my friend, Dr. Stella Immanuel, has treated over 350 COVID patients, including those in their 80s and one in her 90s with comorbidities and has had no deaths and only 2 hospitalizations. The key is early, safe treatment.
Hydroxychloroquine should not be used if the QTc is greater than 500msec. This is very rare and generally only occurs in patients on multiple QT prolonging medications. You will note that the protocol for treatment does include an EKG before treatment. Most of our EKG machines will calculate a QTc interval.
Successful use of HCQ has been widespread. Here are a few examples (references are noted at the end of this letter):
- French study. 1061 hospitalized COVID patients - 98.7% cure rate1
- Chinese study. Mortality reduced by 60%21
- Another French study. Reduced risk of transfer to ICU or Death by 82%19
- New York study. Risk of hospitalization 84% less than untreated2
- Brazil telemedicine study. Reduced risk of hospitalization by 65%22
- Mount Sinai study. Mortality in hospitalized patients reduced by 50%23
- Milan Italy. 66% reduction in mortality24
- Marseilla, France 3737 patients. HCQ with azithromycin 82% reduction of death25
There are many other studies. Now that we know that it must be used early, with zinc, and following QTc interval in appropriate patients, we should get high cure rates, greater than 80%. What we should be focusing on is teaching all of our colleagues how to use it safely for prophylaxis and treatment.
A word about prophylaxis. It is effective! Six or more prophylactic doses of HCQ used by more than 1200 health care workers in India had a remarkably high (>80%) protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection.13 The dose was 400mg weekly after 400mg BID loading dose on day one.
One final word on HCQ. In countries where HCQ is used weekly for the prevention of malaria, the incidence and mortality from COVID-19 is one one-hundredth of what it is in developed countries that are not using HCQ even though the developed countries have more “advanced” medical treatment and better hospitals and ICUs.14 This fact alone should tell us a lot about the benefit of prophylactic HCQ. In addition a study of 1.8 billion people showed 74.9 % decrease in mortality in countries that used early HCQ treatment compared to those that didn’t.26
We have seen unprecedented attacks by media, internet, and “specialists”, many of whom are our physician colleagues, to discredit a drug that has been used safely for decades and now is being shown to reduce mortality by 50 to 80%. Because of fraudulent studies, faulty studies, and large randomized trials that could really demonstrate the benefit of HCQ have been discontinued. At the same time remdesivir is proclaimed to be the standard of care, even though studies show only non-clinically significant benefit on mortality!15,16 Why are we using a drug with minimal benefit when a medication with high benefit and low cost is available? I do not pretend to know who is behind this, but I do know that it is well orchestrated and vicious. Someone is apparently willing to sacrifice human life for their political or economic benefit.
In addition to HCQ, we have another medication that can be used to treat this virus. It is now just gaining momentum as studies are being completed and more physicians are using it. This medicine is Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic, that has potent antiviral properties. This is an incomplete list of it’s benefits:
- 44 studies to date (17 in peer review journals)
- 100% show positive results with reductions in hospitalizations and death by an average of 87%
- Ivermectin preexposure prophylaxis has been shown to prevent transmission and development of COVID-19 disease in those exposed to infected patients.
- Ivermectin hastens recovery and prevents deterioration in patients with mild to moderate disease treated early after symptoms.
- Ivermectin hastens recovery and avoidance of ICU admission and death in hospitalized patients.
- Ivermectin reduces mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19
- Ivermectin leads to striking reductions in case-fatality rates in regions with widespread use.
- The safety, availability, and cost of ivermectin is nearly unparalleled given its near nil drug interactions along with only mild and rare side effects observed in almost 40 years of use and billions of doses administered.
We are in a battle with a serious viral infection. We can not let Big Pharma, the media, the government, or whoever is interfering with our ability to give effective prehospital treatment for COVID-19.
After you review this information and the additional studies on c19study.com, if you agree that hydroxychloroquine should be made available so that we physicians can use our best judgement to treat our patients, please email me your approval as soon as possible and you can join our efforts to make HCQ and Ivermectin available.
In the meantime, until we have HCQ and Ivermectin readily available, I have two suggestions:
1.Use what HCQ is available on your most ‘at risk’ patients.
2.Put the rest on Quercetin (Q), an OTC plant flavonol supplement.
Quercetin also attaches to the spike protein on the COVID-19 virus and is a zinc ionophore. It actually attaches to the spike protein with greater affinity than HCQ.17 It can be used in patients with prolonged QTc since it actually shortens QTc interval.18 The prophylactic dose is 500mg twice a day for as long as the pandemic lasts. It should be taken with Zinc 30-60mg, Vitamin C 1000mg, and Vitamin D 2000 iu or 3000 iu daily. It can increase Coumadin levels so INR should be followed in Coumadin patients. Quercetin probably is just as effective in preventing COVID as HCQ, but it has not been studied as extensively as HCQ. There are a number of studies ongoing, however.
Now that we know the safe and effective way to use HCQ, I believe that we should be disseminating this information as quickly as possible to all of our colleagues in the state. I hope that this information is helpful as we move forward to successfully treat patients, save lives, and end this pandemic. Again, I ask that you contact me if you are in agreement that HCQ should be made available so that we can do what we are trained to do - find the best treatments and provide them to our patients.
David Calderwood, MD
COVID-19 PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS
Hydroxychloroquine 400mg BID day one
Then 400mg each week for 3 months
Then 400mg every 2 weeks until pandemic ends
Daily- Zinc 30-60mg
Vitamin C 1-2 gms
Vitamin D3 2000 iu
COVID-19 POST-EXPOSURE PROPYLAXIS
Hydroxycholoroquine 400mg BID day one
Then 200mg days 2-5
Then 400mg weekly for 3 months
Then 400mg every other week until pandemic ends
Daily- Zinc 30-60mg
Vitamin C 1-2 gm
Vitamin D3 2000 iu
This is a small sampling of some of the studies on c19study.com:
- April 29, 2020. Northwell Health system in Circulation. 201 hospitalized patients: 3.5%
- July 1, 2020. Henry Ford study. 2541 patients. No torsades de pointes.
- May 5, 2020. Marseille, France retrospective study. Administration of the HCQ+AZ
fatality rate in patients. No cardiac toxicity in 1061 patients
- August 17. Saudi Arabia. 2733 patients found to be safe, highly tolerable and minimal
Studies that have shown no benefit are given in toxic doses, given too late, given to the sickest patients, or given without zinc.
- Recovery trial gave 2.4 gm in first 24 hours, 9 gm in 10 days-over 3 times the safe dose. The total safe dose in 5 days is 2.4 gm.
- Remap COVID - same dose as Recovery.
- Solidarity - 800mg initial dose, 800mg 12 hours later then 400mg every 12 hours for 9 more days. 8.8grams over 10 days. Just slightly less than recovery trial.
- April 11, 2020. Brazil Mayla Borba Study in JAMA. High dose 12 g in 10 days.
Effective for treatment.
1. April 20, 2020. French study. 1061 COVID Hospitalized patients 98.7% cure rate
2. April 23, 2020. Chinese study. Fatalities are 18.8% (9/48) in HCQ group, 47.4% (238/502)
in the NHCQ group (P<0.001) . Significantly reduced inflammatory cytokine IL-6
- May 5, 2020. Marseille, France retrospective study. Administration of the HCQ+AZ
fatality rate in patients. No cardiac toxicity in 1061 patients.
4. May 27, 2020. Marseille, France retrospective study. Treatment with HCQ-AZ was
associated with a decreased risk of transfer to ICU or death (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.18 0.11-
0.27), decreased risk of hospitalization ≥10 days (odds ratios 95% CI 0.38 0.27-0.54) and
shorter duration of viral shedding (time to negative PCR: HR 1.29 1.17-1.42).
5. New York Sudy. 4 of 141 treated patients (2.8%) were hospitalized, which was significantly
less (p<0.001) compared with 58 of 377 untreated patients (15.4%) (odds ratio 0.16, 95% CI
0.06-0.5). Therefore, the odds of hospitalization of treated patients were 84% less than in the
untreated group. One patient (0.7%) died in the treatment group versus 13 patients (3.5%) in
the untreated group (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.03-1.5; p=0.16).
6. Sao Paulo, Brazil telemedicine treatment with HCQ and azithromycin. Need for and
hospitalization was 1.9% in the treatment group and 5.4% in the control group (2.8 times
greater) number needed to treat was 28 (NNT = 28). In those who started treatment before
versus after the seventh day of symptoms, the need for hospitalization was 1.17% and 3.2%,
- June 30, 2020. Mount Sinai study. 50% reduction in mortality in hospitalized patients with
8. July 10, 2020 Milan Italy study shows 66% reduced mortality.
9. July 1, 2020. Henry Ford study. 50% reduction in mortality with HCQ alone, 24% with
HCQ plus azithromycin. Doses of meds varied and unknown, but still showed benefit.
- July 2020, Marseilla 3737 patients. HCQ with azith 82% reduction in death. 0.5%
Even more effective with zinc.
NYU Grooman School of Medicine. 1.5 time more effective when given with zinc
Effective for prophylaxis.
- Indian Health Care Worker Trial. 1173 health care workers with HCQ prophylaxis vs workers without prophylaxis by 6 weeks of taking 400mg HCQ once a week after a loading dose of 800mg, reduced COVID infections by 80%.
- Portugal study. The odds ration of [Covid-19] infection in patient with chronic treatment with HCQ is half.
3. Bulgarian study. 92.7% reduction of infection in health care worker with HCQ propylaxis
Post exposure prophylaxis.
- NEJM study. HCQ post exposure given on average 4 days post exposure and with zinc and
significant) but was started too late
- Korean study. 182 hospital patients and 22 hospital staff treated in just over 2 days post
Ivermectin prophylaxis- 3 RCT and 5 OCT all positive (4 in PEER review)
- Elgazzar, et. al. RCT. 200 HCW. 100 on Ivermectin with PPE and 100 PPE alone. 80% reduction in + PCR.
2. Shouman et al. 304 Close contacts of COVID patients. 91.3% reduction in developing COVID in Ivermectin treated compared to controls.
3. Carvallo et al. 1195 Health professionals RCT, 788 Ivermectin and 407 no treatment. 0% infections in the Ivermectin and 58% in no treatment
4. Alam et al. RCT. 118 HCW. 12 mg Iver monthly vs none. 90.6% decrease in developing COVID
- Meta-analysis. 2282 Patients from RCTs showing 75% reduction in mortality in the most severely ill.
2. Meta-analysis. Total 35 studies with 10,336 patients (17 RCT with 2528 patients)
Early treatment 84% improvement
Late treatment 39% improvement
Prophylasis 90% improvement
- Wang et al. Lancet. 237 patients randomly assigned to remdesivir or placebo. This was the study that Dr Fauci claimed demonstrated why remdesivir should be the standard of care. It showed no statistically significant decrease in mortality or recovery time. He then unmasked the study by informing the placebo patients that they were not getting the antiviral drug.
Leave a Reply.
- Please click here to use our new people news and views page. This will serve as our Social Media Page you can go to if fb stops.
- Please bookmark our webpage and use it like an app. Email us if you would like to be sent updates when videos of August 24th are ready for you.
* INDICATES REQUIRED FIELD
Click here for old articles to remember how we got to this point
are current articles.
- Please bookmark our webpage and use it like an app. Email us if you would like to be sent updates when videos of August 24th are ready for you.
Proudly powered by Weebly